Further update: Contents last modified on 11th April at around 1:25 p.m. to suit the author's mood and taste.
Feb 13th, 2006
Problems, in general, can’t have solutions. If there was one, there wouldn’t have been a problem at first place. {So, problems are nothing but facts; facts that are a little annoying, but facts nevertheless.}
Somebody might come up with examples to refute this claim, like this:
Q: how much is 17 times 18?
A: Hmmm, the conventional wisdom has it as 306.
Well, this kind of example is a special case and rejected outright because of the sheer number of living beings that know the answer.
I know there is an alternate version which goes like this:
Problems are meant to have solutions. If there weren’t any, nobody would have tried to pose it as a problem. {So, problems generally have solutions, and they would have been accepted as facts, otherwise.}
Again, some frustrated reader, might come up with examples to refute this claim, like this:
Q: how do I get a girlfriend?
A:
Well, may be, this is a special case as well and need not be considered in this discussion. {So, we will assume
Now, I pose a problem - to find out which of the above theories are right.
The discerning reader would have realised that theory #1 is deftly done and hardly makes any claim about problems having solutions. Where as, according to theory #2, there will always have to be a solution, now that I have specified a problem.
My dear reader, here the supporters of theory #2 are caught off guard unless they offer a convincing solution to this problem. Else, the winners by default,
1. Contradiction is the only tautology.
2. Incompleteness is the most complete.
3. Cynicism is beautiful.
Final note:
There are no problems. There are only facts. On second thoughts, there are no facts either.
On third thoughts,everything is nothing.It all comes down to 'Zero'.Uh! And I tell THAT to Zero?!
ReplyDelete